Richard.Jewell.net 

CollegeWriting.info

Home Page   

               

S5. Teaching Writing
in Many Disciplines and Fields

"Teaching"
Section
Home

     

b. 5 Rubrics for
Evaluating
Papers
 

  

 c. Save Time
Grading

 Rubrics
Holistic Scoring
Checklist Grading
  

  

d. WAC & WID
Lessons
for Students

          

      

      

        
     

  Five Interdisciplinary Rubrics for Evaluating Papers  ( 2-13-04 ) 

             

[For an introductory discussion, see "Rubrics."]

         

            A “rubric” is a set of guidelines used for clear, consistent evaluation.  It also is an explanation offered to those being evaluated.  The four rubrics on this sheet represent four systems for evaluating formal written papers.  They may be used as they are, or as examples to help you develop your own. 

  

 A “Qualifiable KPI [Key Performance Indicator]” Rubric  --Brenda Wentworth  

 

(Wentworth, Brenda, Assessment Coordinator, College
of
Fine Arts and Humanities. St. Cloud State University . 2003.)

·        In writing the student will have one voice that unifies the writing style of the document.

·        The document presents a clear, concrete, focused, narrow hypothesis or assertion.

·        Students will support assertions with direct evidence from disciplinary sources, mostly primary source readings (give examples), from secondary sources (give examples), and from a few tertiary sources (give examples or exclude tertiary sources if appropriate)

·        The document uses sources of knowledge that are credible.

·        The audience for the document will be (clearly identify the appropriate audience).

·        The organizational structure is clear (introduction-body-conclusion or problem-solution or question-answer or explanatory outline with links, etc.).

·        The document is free of mechanical errors.

“The high achieving or excellent student will be able to accomplish everything in the rubric that is at the level of magazines or journals in the discipline (give examples).  They will be prepared for graduate level work or research but not able to write above master’s degree level.  Their work may contain some new knowledge or draw new conclusions based on the knowledge.

“The average student will be able to accomplish all but one or two of the standards.  Their work will not be at a publishable level in disciplinary magazines or journals.  Their research will be adequate but will contain no new knowledge or reach any new conclusions.

“The low achieving student will be able to accomplish at least four of the standards adequately.  They will minimally accomplish the other standards but their work will be below the average of most college students.  Their writing will be technically imperfect, may contain mechanical errors, and their conclusions may be weak.”

-----

    

   

Individual Criteria: Using a Grid
 Peter Elbow

       
(Elbow, Peter. “Grading Student Writing….” Writing to Learn: Strategies for. .. Writing Across the Disciplines. Ed. Mary Deane Sorcinelli and Peter Elbow. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997. 136-7.)

  

        “There is a traditional and crude distinction between form and content that many teachers use….  Teachers sometimes break out these two broad criteria into four more explicit ones [below].  Yet of course, we can work out our own criteria according to our own tastes—perhaps changing them on different papers….

    

“CORRECT UNDERSTANDING OF COURSE MATERIAL
         
”GOOD IDEAS AND INTERESTING THINKING

         

“CLARITY
              
”MECHANICS….”

Scoring Guide
 Minnesota Community Colleges

     
(Minnesota Community Colleges. Community of Classrooms: A Handbook for Preparing Students for Reading and Writing in College. St. Paul: Minnesota Community College System, 1994. 104.)

   

       [The following rubric was developed as a guide for evaluating developmental writing.]

    

“FOCUS: The writing presents a clear focus.”

   

COHERENCE/UNITY: The information is presented in a logical manner and develops the focus.”

   

SUPPORT: Ample details create a picture, inform or persuade….”

    

CORRECTNESS: The writing adheres to Academic English with only minor distractions.”

   

AUDIENCE: …[T]he reader is moved [and] the writing generally succeeds in meeting the needs of its…targeted audience.”

    
-----

 An Interdisciplinary Rubric for Grading a Paper  --Richard Jewell

 

(Jewell, Richard. Inver Hills Community College. 13 Feb. 2004.)

 

1.   CONTENTS: Are ideas well developed and applied?  Are the ideas sufficiently original?  Is there a central purpose?  Are concepts and terminology appropriate and clear?  Are the critical thinking functions of the field or discipline used well?
     

2.   SUPPORTING DETAILS: Are there adequate and appropriate details (e.g., quotations, paraphrases, examples, stories, statistics, graphics, or a bibliography)?  Do they support the paper’s central concepts?  Are the details well explained and connected to the concepts? 
 

3.   AUDIENCE/STYLE: Does the paper show evidence of consideration of its audience?  Does it use an appropriate academic or professional tone?  Does it speak in an appropriate voice to its audience?
  

4.   ORGANIZATION: Does the paper have a central subject or argument? Are there clear, separate topics and/or sections that start with appropriate topic sentences or subtitles?  Are there clear, developed paragraphs?
 

5.   PROFESSIONAL APPEARANCE: Are mechanics—e.g., grammatical usage, spelling, punctuation, sentence structure, graphics/illustrations, and typing—sufficiently correct?

            You may offer the above to students as general guidelines, or you may score each guideline using letters or points with equal weighting (e.g., “C B A C A” or “2 3 4 2 4” = overall “B”) or unequal weighting (e.g., “C C C” for #1, “B B” for #2, and “A C A” for #3-5 = overall B-).  The best-case scenario is to use guidelines such as these to develop your own specific rubric.     
                  
-----

 Four-Point Web-Design Rubric  --Kathleen Blake Yancey

 

[Yancey, Kathleen Blake. Computers and Composition 21:1 (2004): 96.]

  1. What arrangements are possible?

  2. Who arranges?

  3. What is the intent?

  4. What is the fit between the intent and the effect?

Return to beginning.

----------

         

Most recent update: 8-27-05
     

Contents © 2004 by Richard JewellNonprofit copying for education is allowed.

Page Design © 2002-2004 by Richard Jewell.  

Images courtesy of Barry's Clip Art, Clip Art Warehouse, The Clip Art Universe, Clipart Collection, Microsoft Clip Art Gallery and Design Gallery Live, School Discovery, and Web Clip Art
Home page:  http://collegewriting.info  

Contact the author by going to www.Richard.Jewell.net.  I welcome questions, suggestions, and notes about links.

 - End -